I removed the words "superliberal slant" since there is no qualification given for the term "superliberal." I think any such terms must either be defined here (or reference to an agreed upon definition) before using it.
In general, we should be careful about applying idealogical classifications to people and organization (which it may be possible that SourceWatch articles may include liberal (no pun intended) uses of idealogical classifications). In todays political climate, idealogical classifications are thrown around without classification and context in order to "demonize" a particular entity, or used to imply a negative association of one entity with an unrelated entity with a questionable or bad reputation. -- Termigator 17:28 17 Jul 2003 (EDT)
Looks like this entry has been whitewashed over the past few revisions.