Jump to navigation Jump to search
- That might suggest that peace could only really be achieved by starting from the global perspective and thinking back to the present moment. It would also suggest that trying to reach for a longer period than seven generations (if each is 15 years that's 105 years, a good max human lifespan, if each is 20 years that's 140 years, a great lifespan) would be to over-reach the point of view that any human being could ever achieve in real life - thus to make grievous errors. So are Green Parties right to lay out this as a goal? Or what about Greenpeace which has the all-species perspective?